Srila Prabhupada rejected the impersonal nonsense that the marginal living entity must extinguish their independence and sense of individuality when they surrender to Krishna. Prabhupada explains this here - Devotee – “In the Srimad-Bhagavatam, it says that Krishna did not want us to come to this material world. If Krishna did not want us to come here, why are we here?” Why didn’t Krishna save us from coming to this material world?” Srila Prabhupada - “Because that means you lose your independence. That is force, in Bengali it is said, ‘If you catch one girl or boy, ‘You love me, you love me, you love me.’ ” Is it love? “You love me, otherwise I will kill you!’ Is that love? So Krishna does not want to become a lover like that, on the point of revolver. ‘You love me, otherwise I shall kill you!’ That is not love; that is threatening. Love is reciprocal, voluntary, good exchange of feeling. Then there is love. Not by force; that is rape. Why one is called lover, another is called rape?” (July 8, 1976 in Washington, D.C.)

What should be expected under the heading of "real love, service and surrender?"

The perpetual Spiritual World of Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan are NEVER places based on "master and slave" relationship.

Srila Prabhupada rejected the impersonal nonsense that the marginal living entity must extinguish their independence and sense of individuality when they surrender to Krishna.

Prabhupada explains this here -   

Devotee – “In the Srimad-Bhagavatam, it says that Krishna did not want us to come to this material world. If Krishna did not want us to come here, why are we here?” Why didn’t Krishna save us from coming to this material world?”   

Srila Prabhupada - “Because that means you lose your independence. That is force, in Bengali it is said, ‘If you catch one girl or boy, ‘You love me, you love me, you love me.’ ” Is it love? “You love me, otherwise I will kill you!’ Is that love? So Krishna does not want to become a lover like that, on the point of revolver. ‘You love me, otherwise I shall kill you!’ That is not love; that is threatening. Love is reciprocal, voluntary, good exchange of feeling. Then there is love. Not by force; that is rape. Why one is called lover, another is called rape?” (July 8, 1976 in Washington, D.C.)

No, Krishna does NOT want servants (mindless drones) like that who are forced to serve Him and not allowed to think for themselves by offering their own unique personal contributions, and therefore giving their best to Krishna as individuals in the mood of loving reciprocation.

Real love only exists when it is based on loving exchanges of reciprocation.

Surrendering to Krishna therefore, does NOT mean giving up your individual sense of self and and unique personality that only you have.

In this way, each marginal living entity has their own personality and character unique to ONLY them, no two jiva souls who have 78% of Krishna's qualities, are the same.

Surrender means you choose to serve Krishna with your own unique abilities, when discovered, in the mood of cooperation and reciprocation.

Of course, one needs a qualified Spiritual teacher or Guru to help one discover the full potential of their individuality and unique personality that each marginal living entity (jivatma) is endowed with.

Srila Prabhupada has said that a relationship where one is forced to love another is actually rape and not love.

Love can NEVER be forced.

Therefore, not even Krishna or Guru can force you to love him. And any so called God who tries to force you to obey him and serve him under the heading of selfless love, is a bogus useless cruel God!

In this way, each marginal living entity or Jivatma in the Spiritual World, must have the free will to offer the best of who they are as an independent marginal living entity or person, yet dependent on Krishna through loving exchanges of reciprocation.

The fact is, the marginal living entities never loses that individual ability and unique sense of self in Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan, it is part and parcel of the marginal living entities make up as individual persons.

Therefore regardless of what many devotees from different sangas have said over the years, claiming no past Acharya will ever agree that once a Jiva-tattva (soul) enters Vaikuntha, can they fall to the material creation.

Yes, in most cases these devotees comments are correct with their claim the Jivatma will never again fall down and enter the material world once in Vaikuntha or Goloka-Vrindavan. 

Such comments are also NOT exactly right either, regardless who they claim said them because a small minority, less than 10% of living entities in Vaikuntha or Goloka-Vrindavan, do fall down. 

This is because you have to take into consideration the free will and the independent choices of each Jiva-tattva or marginal living entity. 

Whether other sangas believe it or not, the Jiva-tattva marginal living entities (78% of Krishna's qualities) CAN leave Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan if they want. at any moment they like, if they "choose" to do so.

No one can say "once there in Vaikuntha, they will never again fall down" This is simply NOT true.

No marginal living entity's residency is in a definite state of permanence in Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan. This is because free will always exists there where one can always choose what THEY want to do, including leaving if they want.

Of course everything else in Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan is eternally youthful, fresh and forever new and permanent, devoid of decay and impermanence that only happens in the temporary material creation.

Therefore it is always the marginal living entities choice to stay or go, and not Krishna's choice on His own. Love is a two way street, the jiva-tattva also has their say too. It is all based on cooperation and reciprocation meaning the Jiva-tattva also has a choice too.

As previously said, Krishna does NOT force you to love Him, or force you to stay in Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan, that CHOICE is always yours and not just Krishna's on His own without your input.

A loving relationship is a reciprocal union between Krishna and the individual marginal living entities. This is because real love or service is based on caring relationships.

This further means all loving relationships are NEVER a one way street of master speaks and slave obeys without thinking for themselves.

Who would want to enter a boring loveless Kingdom of a dictatorial God like that? That is what hell is like.

The marginal living entities have their own independence, personality and sense of self that is different from Krishna's Personality and identity. 

In other words the marginal living entities are NOT Krishna or God!

Each marginal living entity or Jiva-tattva are completely separate thinking individuals from Krishna with their OWN unique personality, yet ultimately dependent on Krishna the Supreme Personality of Godhead and cause of all causes  due to being His eternal parts and parcels.

This is a little difficult to understand.

On the other hand, there are other expansions of Krishna, such as the Vishnu-sakti-tattva expansions of Krishna (93% of Krishna's qualities) who NEVER fall down because they ARE Krishna playing different roles in His own pastimes.

The term, "Viṣṇu-śakti-tattva" is explained here - CC Adi 17.21

The number of Vishnu-sakti-tattva's, include many eternal associates from gopis to gopas to family members and others who even appear to be just simple minded associates in Vrindavana.

The Caitanya Caritamrta explains that the great majority of Krishna's eternal associates are indeed also Vishnu-tattva or Vishnu-sakti-tattva or (Both having 93% of Krishna's qualities).

So of course those associates will never leave Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan because they ARE Krishna playing different roles in His own eternal pastimes.

The Jiva-tattva souls or marginal living entities on the other hand, only have 78% of the Krishna's qualities.

The jiva tattva's CAN leave Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan if they choose because they are endowed with an "individual independent nature" each with their own unique personality as part of their marginal make up, separate from Krishna's "Personality".

This means the marginal living entities each have their own "individual personality unique to each of them", meaning they are NOT Krishna.

This independent sense of self, expressed as an individual personality, is the constitutional make up of all marginal living entities. 

To understand personalism, these words are important to understand.

The Jiva-tattvas are NOT "one" with Krishna's personality because they have their own unique individual personality and "sense of self" separate from Krishnas that is unique to each individual marginal living entity.

These individual qualities gives the marginal living entities the free will to leave Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan if they choose, but of course, most (90%) NEVER choose to leave.

The point is, this option of staying or going, must be in the make up of each of the marginal living entities (Jiva-tattvas) if there is to be true loving exchanges that can only happen by having their own individuality and free will.

Without free will and the ability to choose, there can NEVER be any genuine selfless independent expressions and personal offerings of loving service as a individual that one takes pride in because they, with their unique character, have offered to Krishna.

Entering Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan does not mean one extinguishes their individuality and personal feelings of accomplishment or even pride in what they think of and offer to Krishna.

In fact, ONLY in the Spiritual World does one experience the full potential of their individuality, personality and identity and therefore knowing what it feels like BEING the Spiritual Svarupa Body they really are.

The "free will" the Jiva-tattva perpetually has, has nothing to do with Maya! Because there is NO Maya in Goloka Vrindavan or Vaikuntha, but what does also eternally exist in Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan, is FREE WILL.

There is ALWAYS free will that is part and parcel of EVERY Jiva-tattva's eternal nature and make up.

Of course their is greatly restricted free will in the material creation, this is because the marginal living entity's Spiritual body is covered by a material bodily vessel subjected to birth, disease, old age and death.

Furthermore, in the lower species of life, free will does not exist at all, one simply acts by instincts and the demands of the material body they are trapped in.

Yes, why would one foolishly chose to enter the material creation and leave their best friend Krishna? 

Well, most (over 90%) do not ever come here to the material creation.

This eternal trait of the soul in the Spiritual World of having free will, is simply based on their independent freedom and nature to make THEIR own choices in the Kingdom of God.

Sadly, less than 10% do choose to leave Krishna's association for the horrible material creation of repeated birth and death.

I can understand why many devotees and scholars believe one can never fall down from either Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan, why would they make that stupid choice to fall to the temporary decaying material creation?

And all jiva-tattvas can never ever loose their free will or ability to make choices in Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan either.

Krishna will never interfere and stop one who has chosen to enter the material creation, He will give warnings and advice, but if they decide to go, He will not stop them Prabhupada has explained to us.

So we know these days many devotees in different sangas are saying that all past Acharya's proclaim --

"Once you enter Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan, you never ever again fall down to the material world of repeated birth and death because this is Krishna's promise".

And yes that is very true, they do not ever fall down again and leave Vaikuntha "as long as they CHOOSE not to fall down to the material world". 

An important point is made here, which is it is the jiva-tattva's choice also and not just Krishnas.

Without this reciprocation between the marginal living entity and Krishna, there can never be genuine loving exchanges.

And yes, Krishna never breaks His promise however, Krishna cannot ignore what the marginal living entity (jiva-tattva) wants too, their desires and choices MUST be taken into consideration as well.

If the jiva-tattva wants to go to the material creation, then Krishna will not stop that choice because He never forces His love on the Jiva-tattva, that love MUST be voluntary on ''both sides'' in the mood of reciprocation.

Otherwise how can their be genuine love if it is just a one way impersonal none-reciprocal relationship, where the individual marginal living entities feelings are ignored and never considered. 

This means, in an impersonal version of Gods Kingdom, the jiva-tattva is forced to obey without having any personal say or input of  how THEY want to contribute the best within "their" unique individual character.

This further means if the jiva-tattva, as their full Svarupa potential in Gods Kingdom, is denied being able to offer the best of their own unique abilities and talents, then surrendering to such a bogus selfish, cold impersonal God, only leads to a stagnate unproductive spiritual dead mindless drone relationship because one is denied the ability to express themselves through self determination (free will)

This is why Prabhupada says some DO choose to leave Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan and Krishna allows this, Krishna does NOT interfere with their free will, if He did, He would be in the impersonal category described above.

But NEVER does Krishna interfere with the jiva-tattva's free will and right to choose for themselves.

However, Prabhupada also says only a small percentage leaves and gives the figure at less than 10%. (This information can be found on vaniquotes website)

But most are good, Prabhupada says, and they never miss use their free will and choose to leave Gods eternal Kingdom, only a few choose to do this.

So who is Lord Krishna and His many different expansions?

Lord Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the cause of all causes and origin of all Vishnu and Narayana Forms of the Lord.

He is the source of all expansions, from Vishnu-tattva, Vishnu-sakti-tattva, Shiva-tattva and Jiva-tattva.

The term, Viṣṇu-śakti-tattva is explained here - CC Adi 17.21

However, Krishna is the only Personality that has all 64 qualities in full, which is 100% of all His own Individual Self. This makes Krishna the Supreme Personality of Godhead and cause of all that there is.

The jiva tattva souls, also known as the marginal living entities, like us, have 78% of Krishna's qualities.

Also all individual marginal living entities (jivatmas or souls) have ALWAYS existed, therefore, never was there a time when they did not exist, nor in the future will they ever cease to be as Bhagavad Gita tells us.

The individual marginal living entities have ALWAYS had their own individual "sense of self", free will and the ability to choose while in their full potential as eternal servants of the Lord in the Vaikuntha Planets and Goloka Vrindavan.

Relationships in the Kingdom of God are based on loving exchanges and service, and that is only possible when their is loving exchanges of reciprocation between the Supreme Lord and His devotees.

Vishnu-tattva and the other eternal associates in both Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavana, known as Vishnu-sakti-tattva, both have 93% of Krishna's qualities and can never be covered by Maya (Material energy) because they ARE Krishna playing different roles in His own pastimes.

They appear in unlimited different Forms.

Shiva-tattva has 84% and is in a unique mysterious league of His own.

Jiva-tattvas, like us and also includes Lord Brahma and Narada Muni, all have 78% too.

Lord Krishna.          64 qualities or 100%

Vishnu-tattva.          60 qualities or ~93%

Shiva-tattva.             54 qualities or ~84%

Jiva-tattva.               50 qualities or ~78%

The Supreme Personality of Godhead Lord Krishna has all these fifty transcendental qualities in fullness as deep as the ocean.

In other words, the extent of His qualities is inconceivable.

(1) Beautiful features of the entire body
(2) Marked with all auspicious characteristics
(3) Extremely pleasing
(4) Effulgent
(5) Strong
(6) Ever youthful
(7) Wonderful linguist
(8) Truthful
(9) Talks pleasingly
(10) Fluent
(11) Highly learned
(12) Highly intelligent
(13) Genius
(14) Artistic
(15) Extremely clever
(16) Expert
(17) Grateful
(18) Firmly determined
(19) An expert judge of time and circumstances
(20) Sees and speaks on the authority of Vedas, or scriptures
(21) Pure
(22) Self-controlled
(23) Steadfast
(24) Forbearing
(25) Forgiving
(26) Grave
(27) Self-satisfied
(28) Possessing equilibrium
(29) Magnanimous
(30) Religious
(31) Heroic
(32) Compassionate
(33) Respectful
(34) Gentle
(35) Liberal
(36) Shy
(37) The protector of surrendered souls
(38) Happy
(39) The well-wisher of devotees
(40) Controlled by love
(41) all-auspicious
(42) Most powerful
(43) all-famous
(44) Popular
(45) Partial to devotees
(46) Very attractive to all women
(47) all-worship able
(48) all-opulent
(49) all-honourable
(50) The supreme controller.

Besides all of the above-mentioned fifty qualities, Lord Krishna possesses five more, which are sometimes partially manifested in Lord Brahma or Lord Shiva. These transcendental qualities are as follows:

(51) Changeless
(52) all-cognizant
(53) Ever fresh
(54) sac-cid-ananda (possessing an eternal blissful body)
(55) Possessing all mystic perfections.

Krishna also possesses five other qualities, which are manifest in the body of Narayana/Vishnu, and they are listed as follows:

(56) He has inconceivable potency.
(57) Uncountable universes generate from His body.
(58) He is the original source of all incarnations.
(59) He is the giver of salvation to the enemies whom He kills.
(60) He is the attractor of liberated souls.

Besides these sixty transcendental qualities, Krishna has four more, which are not manifested even in the Vishnu/Narayana form of Godhead, what to speak of the demigods or living entities.

They are as follows:

(61) He is the performer of wonderful varieties of pastimes (especially His childhood pastimes).

(62) He is surrounded by devotees endowed with wonderful love of Godhead.

(63) He can attract all living entities all over the universes by playing on His flute.

(64) He has a wonderful excellence of beauty which cannot be rivaled anywhere in the creation.

The Absolute Truth is anandamaya (desiring to increase His joy), hence from His original form He expands and becomes many.

These emanations from the Supreme Person are of two categories: full expansions and partially manifested expansions.

The Lord's various full and partial expansions and the Lord Himself simultaneously co-exist, only appearing to manifest under the influence of time.

These expansions of the Supreme Being are known as Vishnu-tattva, and they are also Supreme Absolute Truth.

While non-different from the Lord, the Vishnu-tattvas all accept their own role as Godhead in the mood of Servitor to the "original" Supreme Being.

This relationship is the foundation of Vedic monotheism, which encompasses the inconceivable, absolute personal nature of the original Godhead.

The Supreme Being possesses two other expansive qualities known as Shiva-tattva and jiva-tattva.

Together with Vishnu-tattva, these three qualities are representative of the Absolute Person's internal, external and marginal energies.

The Lord has expanded Himself as Lord Shiva and Lord Brahma, and we, the living entities, are also expansions. Like us, Lord Brahma is also jiva-tattva.

Lord Siva is between Vishnu-tattva and jiva-tattva. And Lord Visnu is Vishnu-tattva.

Vishnu-tattva and jiva-tattva - they are expansions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead too

1 - Direct expansions are Vishnu-tattvas who ARE Krishna Himself playing another identity in His own pastimes 

2 - And the Jiva-tattvas expansions who experience their own sense of self and independent from Krishna, having been endowed with ''their own'' personality, identity, unique character and individuality.

Therefore we can summarize as

Lord Krishna.          64 qualities or 100%

Vishnu-tattva.          60 qualities or ~93%

Shiva-tattva.             54 qualities or ~84%

Jiva-tattva.               50 qualities or ~78%

This is the reason why Krishna is called Param Purushottam, Purnavatar or Supreme Personality of Godhead".

Srimad Bhagavatam 1.3.29:

Srila Prabhupada - "Learned scholars in transcendental subjects have carefully analyzed the summum bonum Krsna to have sixty-four principal attributes.

All the expansions or categories of the Lord possess only some percentages of these attributes. But Sri Krsna is the possessor of the attributes cent percent.

And His personal expansions such as svayam-prakasa, tad-ekatma up to the categories of the avataras who are all visnu-tattva, possess up to ninety-three percent of these transcendental attributes.

Lord Siva, who is neither avatara nor avesa nor in between them, possesses almost eighty-four percent of the attributes.

But the jivas, or the individual living beings in different statuses of life, possess up to the limit of seventy-eight percent of the attributes.

In the conditioned state of material existence, the living being possesses these attributes in very minute quantity, varying in terms of the pious life of the living being.

The most perfect of living beings is Brahma, the supreme administrator of one universe. He possesses seventy-eight percent of the attributes in full.

All other demigods have the same attributes in less quantity, whereas human beings possess the attributes in very minute quantity.

The standard of perfection for a human being is to develop the attributes up to seventy-eight percent in full.

The living being can never possess attributes like Siva, Visnu or Lord Krsna.

A marginal living being (jiva tattva) can become godly by developing the seventy-eight-percent transcendental attributes in fullness, but the jiva tattva can never become a God like Shiva, Visnu or Krsna.

The Jiva-tattva can become a Brahma in due course.

The godly living beings who are all residents of the planets in the spiritual sky are eternal associates of God in different spiritual planets called Hari-dhama and Mahesa-dhama.

The abode of Lord Krsna above all spiritual planets is called Krsnaloka or Goloka Vrndavana, and the perfected living being, by developing seventy-eight percent of the above attributes in fullness, can enter the planet of Krsnaloka after leaving the present material body in the material creation and stay there "if they choose".

The jiva-tattva living entities ALWAYS have "free will and the ability to choose" while in their full potential in the Spiritual Planets. 

And regardless of what many devotees have said, the marginal living entity (jiva tattva souls) CAN leave Vaikuntha or even Goloka Vrindavan if they choose to do so.

This "free will" has nothing to do with Maya, it is simply based on the souls "ability to ALWAYS choose for themselves that all Jiva-tattvas never ever loses in Vaikuntha or Goloka-Vrindavan.

So we know so many devotees in different sangas are saying that all past acharyas say once entering Vaikuntha, one never ever falls down, or enters the material world of repeated birth and death, because that is Krishna's promise.

And yes that is true, they do not fall down, as long as they CHOOSE not to go to the material world, ultimately it is the living entities choice and not just Krishnas

In other words, that choice is not Krishna's alone, it is also the marginal living entities decision too.

Although it is a fact that Krishna never breaks His promise however, if the marginal living entity or jiva-tattva wants to go to the material creation, then Krishna will not stop that choice because He never forces His love on the jiva-tattva, that MUST be voluntary, otherwise how can there be genuine loving exchanges if one is forced to stay in Vaikuntha or Goloka-Vrindavan.

This is why Prabhupada says some DO leave Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan, giving the figure as less than 10%, but most are good, Prabhupada says, they never miss use their free will and choose to leave Gods eternal Kingdom.

Sakti-tattvas refers to the many energies of the Lord including both Vishnu-tattva and Jiva-tattva.

Durga Devi is Sakti-tattva also but is technically an expansion of Vishnu-tattva playing her role in the material creation.

Sakti tattva means the energies of Krishna.

In Goloka there are many expansions of Radharani who act as gopis and other inhabitants of Goloka as well, they are in ''Her category'' of the Sakti-tattva, which are also expansions of Vishnu-tattva who have 93% of Krishna's qualities.

All of Krishna's expansions are called Shakti-tattva however, as said above, there are different categories of the Lords Shakti-tattva.

Prabhupada has said, even though many in other Sangas and even some in ISKCON disagree, it is only the category of Sakti-tattva called jiva-tattva (78%) can the living entity fall down from Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan to the material creation.

But NOT Vishnu-tattvas (93%) or Vishnu-sakti-tattvas (93%) because they are a different category of Sakti-tattva, they are different expressions of Krishna's Personality directly. In other words, they ARE Krishna just playing another role in His own Pastimes.

Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattva never fall down because they are non different from Krishna and as said above. In these Forms Krishna is just playing different parts in His own play as a gopi or gopa or family member etc, He can be any personality in Goloka He chooses.

Therefore many personalities in Goloka-Vrindavan are both Vishnu-tattva (who play a more prominent role) and Vishnu-sakti-tattva, (who tend to be Krishna playing a more unnoticed roll as His expansion)

Also there are many jiva-tattvas whose original svarupa is a gopi, gopa, etc too however, they can NEVER be Vishnu-tattva or Vishnu-sakti-tattva expansions with only their 78% of Krishna's qualities. (The marginal living entity  can never be God)

The term, "Viṣṇu-śakti-tattva" is explained here - CC Adi 17.21

Lecture on BG 1.13-14 -- London, July 14, 1973:

Srila Prabhupada - "Prakṛti means enjoyed. Enjoyer and... Predominator and the predominated. So jīva-bhūta, we jīvas, we are all prakṛti. Puruṣa is only Kṛṣṇa. All living entities... Viṣṇu-tattva is puruṣa-tattva, and we are śakti-tattva, śakti, energy, marginal energy of Kṛṣṇa.

So energy is prakṛti. The prakṛti is not puruṣa. So Māyāvāda philosophy is wrong. They pose them as so 'ham. So 'ham "I am the same." How you can be same? In the śāstra it is said that "You living entity, you are prakṛti."

How you can become same, you puruṣa. This is mistake. How prakṛti, how a woman can become man? Artificially one can become. Here also so-called woman, they are also puruṣa. They are thinking puruṣa. Puruṣa means enjoyer. Here woman is also thinking to enjoy, and the so-called man is also thinking to enjoy.

Everyone. Nobody wants to serve. Everyone wants to be served. Puruṣa attitude.

There are Jīva-tattvas, there are śakti-tattvas, there are Viṣṇu-tattvas. People do not know it".

Lecture on BG 9.11 -- Calcutta, June 30, 1973:

Srila Prabhupada - "Of course, Kṛṣṇa is viṣṇu-tattva. Kṛṣṇa is not in the category of jīva-tattva. There are jīva-tattvas, there are śakti-tattvas, there are viṣṇu-tattvas. People do not know it.

Therefore in the next line it is said, paraṁ bhāvam ajānantaḥ. They do not know what is viṣṇu-tattva, what is jīva-tattva, what is śakti-tattva, how things are working. Paraṁ bhāvam ajānantaḥ (BG 9.11). Mama bhūta-maheśvaram: "I am the Supreme Person."

Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures

Srila Prabhupada -"Gadādhara is śakti-tattva. So in this way, God is person and His personal expansions are innumerable, unlimited.

Lecture on SB 1.3.27 -- Los Angeles, October 2, 1972:

Srila Prabhupada - "So there are expansions, svāṁśa, personal expansion, and separated expansion. The personal expansions are called viṣṇu-tattva. Baladeva.

Just like Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu, His personal expansion is Nityānanda Prabhu and Advaita Prabhu. And Śrīvāsādi they are separated expansion.

Although they are associates, but Śrīvāsa, jīva-tattva; and Nityānanda Prabhu and Advaita Prabhu, viṣṇu-tattva.

And Gadādhara is śakti-tattva. So in this way, God is person and His personal expansions are innumerable, unlimited. Viṣṇu-tattva. They are worshipable.

And other tattva, śakti-tattva and jīva-tattva, they are meant for service. But all together taken, that is one. That is Absolute Truth.

Śakti-tattva is the energy of God".

Lecture on SB 1.5.15 -- New Vrindaban, June 19, 1969:

Srila Prabhupada - "So God is one, but there are different kinds of demigods. That is also a fact. They are accepted as different parts and parcels of God, as we are also.

The demigods are also living entities. They are not viṣṇu-tattva. There are viṣṇu-tattva, jīva-tattva and śakti-tattva. Viṣṇu-tattva is the Supreme Absolute Truth, jīva-tattva is part and parcel, and śakti-tattva is the energy of God.

So the demigods... You can become a demigod. You can become. If you follow the process how to become, then you become one day the demigod in the sun planet. It is not difficult. You can become one day even Lord Brahmā.

Viṣṇu-tattva, jīva-tattva, śakti-tattva. There are different tattvas".

Lecture on SB 2.1.3 -- Delhi, November 6, 1973:

Srila Prabhupada - "Anything about Nārāyaṇa, that is not of this material world. That is of the spiritual world. Therefore, Kṛṣṇa question and Kṛṣṇa answer, they are not material things.

Therefore, if we always engage ourself in Kṛṣṇa question and Kṛṣṇa answer... śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ (SB 7.5.23).

Therefore it is called Viṣṇu. Not that any other śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam. Only Viṣṇu. Viṣṇu means viṣṇu-tattva. Rāmādi-mūrtiṣu kalā-niyamena tiṣṭhan.

Viṣṇu-tattva means rāmādi-mūrti. Rāma, Nṛsiṁha, Varāha, Kṛṣṇa... There are so many. They are described. They are viṣṇu-tattva. Viṣṇu-tattva, jīva-tattva, śakti-tattva. There are different tattvas. So śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam.

If you engage yourself in śravaṇaṁ kīrtanam, that should be for Viṣṇu, not for any other, anyone else. Śravaṇaṁ kīrtanaṁ viṣṇoḥ smaraṇam. Smaraṇam, meditation. That is also Viṣṇu.

Tattva is manifested in different ways: Viṣṇu-tattva, Viṣṇu-śakti-tattva, jīva-tattva, like that.

Viṣṇu-śakti-tattva is explained here - CC Adi 17.21

Lecture on SB 6.2.7 -- Vrndavana, September 10, 1975:

Srila Prabhupada - "If one thinks that the holy name of Hari is as good as the name of other demigods, then it is nāmāparadha. That is not śuddha-nāma. So people are being misguided in that way. But the śāstra does not say that.

The śāstra says, harer nāma, harer nāma (CC Adi 17.21), the holy name of Hari, Kṛṣṇa, Viṣṇu, Viṣṇu-tattva. Hari means Viṣṇu-tattva. There are... Tattva is manifested in different ways: Viṣṇu-tattva, Viṣṇu-śakti-tattva, jīva-tattva, like that.

So śāstra says that harer nāma, Viṣṇu-tattva. Viṣṇu... Of course, Lord Viṣṇu has several thousands of names according to His different activities: Viṣṇu, Nārāyaṇa, Hari, Govinda, Mādhava, many names".

Sri Caitanya-caritamrta Lectures.

Srila Prabhupada - "Īśvara-tattva and śakti-tattva. So within this group, there is no this material energy because in the spiritual world there is no action of material energy, only spiritual energy".

Lecture on CC Adi-lila 1.12 -- Mayapur, April 5, 1975 -

Srila Prabhupada  - "We do not know who is the actual architect behind all this nice material creation. That is Mahā-Viṣṇu, and His incarnation is Advaita Prabhu. Caitanya Mahāprabhu is directly Kṛṣṇa, or Kṛṣṇa's incarnation.

Nityānanda Prabhu is directly incarnation of Baladeva, and similarly, Śrī Advaita Prabhu is incarnation of Mahā-Viṣṇu. So all of Them are on the equal footing. Śrī-kṛṣṇa-caitanya prabhu-nityānanda, śrī-advaita.

They are on the same equal level. And then śakti-tattva, Śrī-Gadādhara and Śrīvāsādi-gaura-bhakta-vṛnda. Gadādhara is the internal energy, and Śrīvāsādi-gaura-bhakta-vṛnda, they are marginal energy.

So Īśvara-tattva and śakti-tattva. So within this group, there is no this material energy because in the spiritual world there is no action of material energy, only spiritual energy. In the material world there is action of material energy.

In the spiritual world there is no material energy. Therefore, in this Pañca-tattva, there is no mention of material energy because in the spiritual world there is no material energy.

We have to study īśvara-tattva, then śakti-tattva, jīva-tattva. That is knowledge; that is education. Durga even though shakti-tattva is also Vishnu-tattva" End of Quote.

The Jiva-tattva souls (78% of Krishna's qualities) ALWAYS have "free will and the ability to choose" in their full potential be it in the material world or Spiritual Planets, they never loose that individual ability even in Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan.

Therefore regardless of what many devotees have said over the years, claiming no past acharays will ever agree that once a jiva tattva soul is in Vaikuntha they again will never again enter the material world, is not exactly right.

The fact is any "Jiva-tattvas (souls)" CAN leave Vaikuntha or even Goloka Vrindavan if they choose to do so.

What past Acharya's are really referring to are different Vishnu-sakti-tattva expansions of Krishna who never fall down, that number includes many eternal associates from gopis to gopas and others who even appear to be just simple minded associates.

The Caitanya Caritamrta explains that the great majority of Krishna's eternal associates are indeed Vishnu-tattva or Vishnu-sakti-tattvas, so of course those associates never leave Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan because they ARE Krishna.

But the Jiva-tattva souls who can only reach 78% of the Lords qualities and can leave Vaikuntha or Goloka-Vrindavan because they have an individual independent personality that is separate from Krishna's Personality and therefore can choose for themselves.

The marginal living entity's individuality and personality  is important to understand, the Jiva-tattvas are NOT "one" with Krishna's Personality.

This is because they have their own unique personality and individuality that gives them their own sense of self and the free will to leave even Goloka-Vrindavan, if they choose to do so, however, of course, most NEVER choose to leave (the figure is less than 10%)

The fact is that option is always there as part of the marginal living entities natural constitution, it has to be this way if there is to be true loving exchanges and reciprocation.

Without free will and individuality, there can never be genuine selfless love.

This "free will" the Jiva-tattva perpetually has, has nothing to do with Maya! Because there is NO Maya in Goloka Vrindavan or Vaikuntha.

However, there is always free will perpetually in Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan. Free will and the ability to make choices, is also part and parcel of the Jiva-tattva's eternal constitution.

This eternal nature of the soul is simply based on the "ability to reciprocate with Krishna and having the ability to choose for themselves what they want to do or how to serve in Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan under the heading of cooperation and reciprocation.

All Jiva-tattvas never ever loose this when in Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan.

So we know these days, many devotees in different sangas quote past Acharyas -

"Once entering Vaikuntha or Goloka Vrindavan one never ever again falls down to the material world of repeated birth and death because this is Krishna's promise".

And yes that is true, they do not ever fall down again and leave Vaikuntha, that is, as long as they do not CHOOSE to fall down and go to the material world.

Yes, Krishna never breaks His promise however, if the Jiva-tattva wants to go to the material creation, then Krishna will not interfere with that decision either.

This is because Krishna never forces His love on the Jiva-tattva (marginal living entities), that MUST be voluntary between Krishna and the marginal living entity, otherwise how can their be genuine love if one is forced to stay in Vaikuntha or even Goloka Vrindavan?

This is why Prabhupada says there are some that DO choose to leave Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan and gives the figure at less than 10%. This means only a very few choose to do leave for the material creation, meaning over 90% choose to NEVER fall to the material creation.

Therefore most are good Prabhupada has said, they do not CHOOSE to misuse their free will and leave Krishna's eternal Kingdom.

Sadly, some devotees still have no idea of what being a servant of Krishna really means.

This understanding about "free will", is NOT referring to the "conditioned souls" in the material creation, who's free will is greatly restricted by the laws of material nature, and only experienced in a very small way in a human body.

(In the lower species of life, there is no free will or karma created, only instinct and the bodily demands of eating, sleeping mating and defending)

This comment below by Prabhupada, is referring to the living entity's "free will" in the Spiritual World! 

This is ONLY where the marginal living entities experience the full potential of who they really are as their Svarupa marginal spiritual body.

Yet still in 2020, there are some foolish immature devotees who believe surrender means giving up your independence in the Spiritual World and let Krishna control everything you do and you.

This nonsense idea that surrender means giving up your independence, is really impersonalism! This nonsense idea was popular with the 1960s and 70s pioneering devotees.

However, Prabhupada rejected this silly immature impersonal nonsense that we all must extinguish our independence and sense of individuality when we surrender to Krishna and eventually enter the Spiritual World.

Prabhupada explains this here -

Devotee – “In the Srimad-Bhagavatam, it says that Krishna did not want us to come to this material world. If Krishna did not want us to come here, why are we here?” Why didn’t Krishna save us from coming to this material world?”

Srila Prabhupada - “Because that means you lose your independence. That is force, in Bengali it is said, ‘If you catch one girl or boy, ‘You love me, you love me, you love me.’ ” Is it love? “You love me, otherwise I will kill you!’ Is that love? So Krishna does not want to become a lover like that, on the point of revolver. ‘You love me, otherwise I shall kill you!’ That is not love; that is threatening. Love is reciprocal, voluntary, good exchange of feeling. Then there is love. Not by force; that is rape. Why one is called lover, another is called rape?” (July 8, 1976 in Washington, D.C.)

What Prabhupada is saying, is no one, "NOT even Krishna Himself", can ever FORCE you to love Him, or surrender to Him and obey His order.

This is because the marginal living entities NEVER lose being independent living beings who perpetually have their own full unique independent expression of free will.

This further means the marginal living entities always have the ability to choose for themselves of what they want to do, or even not do for Krishna in the Spiritual Worlds.

The marginal living entities therefore NEVER lose their own unique individual personality and sense of independent self. 

Real love, surrender and service is ONLY achieved by CHOICE and NEVER by force.

Even if fear tactics, bullying and threats are used that is attempting to warning the living entity that if you do NOT follow, then you are carving your way to hell, still he ultimate choice is the marginal living entities.

This means even if such hash threats are said as a warning, still, the final choice is YOURS and is NOT the Guru or Krishna's position to FORCE you into submission as Prabhupada says above.

Krishna is like the Sun and all of his different expansions are like the Sunrays (sakti). So what are the different categories of Krishna's "parts and parcels" or different expansions?

Krishna's love is based on selfless service, surrender and personal intimate exchanges and reciprocation with His devotees (parts and parcels) is far greater than any of them can give to Him.

Krishna is like the Sun and all of his different expansions are like the sunrays.

These sun-rays are called the sakti-tattva energy of Krishna. However, there are different categories of sakti energy. 

The Sakti-tattva energy of Krishna includes different individual units of living energy called the jiva-tattva. Where as the Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattva expansions are "all-one" with Krishna, unlike the individual jiva-tattva souls.

Shiva-tattva is in a league of his own, neither jiva-tattva, Vishnu-sakti-tattva or Vishnu-tattva 

In this way Sakti-tattva is divided into four categories-

1 -Vishnu-tattva, 

2 - Vishnu-sakti-tattvas, 

3 - Shiva-tattva,

4 - jiva-tattva are like the Sunrays.

So what are the categories of Krishna's "parts and parcels" of different expansions?

1 - Vishnu-tattvas (93.75% of Krishna's qualities) like His older brother Balarama and Vishnu or Narayana in each Vaikuntha Planet, or Maha Vishnu, Garbhodakashayi Visnu and Paramatma who enter the material creation

2 - Sakti-vishnu-tattvas (93.75% of Krishna's qualities), like Srimati Radharani some, leading gopis and gopas and other associates and residents of Vrindavan or many who appear in Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu's lila.

None of these can ever fall down to the material world because they are "direct" expansions of Krishna meaning they ARE Krishna's personality expressed in a different way according to pastime. 

In other words both Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattvas are Krishna Himself playing another role in His own pastimes.

The majority of living entites are Vishnu-sakti-tatvas in the Spiritual World of Goloka-Vrindavana and the unlimited Vaikuntha planets.

And, as explained above, both Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattva can NEVER fall down and forget because THEY are full expansions of Krishna's personality just playing another role in His unlimited pastimes (lilas) in either the Vaikuntha Planets, Goloka Vrindavan, or in the material creation.

In other words, all Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattva ARE Krishna in a different forms experiencing His own pastimes.

3 - Shiva-tattva (84.375% of Krishna's qualities) in a league of His own. Many scholars believe Hanuman is an incarnation of Shiva, but not all. There are many incarnations of Shiva however, he can never be Vishnu-tattva or Vishnu-sakti-tattva. Although Shiva and a Vishnu-tattva form can merge as one which really means a Vishnu-tattva form is in the mood of Shiva. 

Once Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu adapted the "mood" of Shiva, not that He is Shiva. This can also be the same for other Vishnu-tattva expansions that are tinged with Lord Shiva's attributes. 

4 - jiva-tattvas that have 78.125% of Krishna's qualities and are known as the "marginal living entities" are also Krishna's sakti expansions but NOT direct full expansions like Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattva explansions. 

The individual jiva-tattvas or marginal living entities, are NOT directly krishna like the above 2 categories of Vishnu-tattva and Vishnu-sakti-tattva are, (Lord Shiva is NOT Vishnu-tattva or Vishnu-sakti-tattva). 

The jiva-tattvas or marginal living entities, are independent free thinking thinking jiva-souls who have full free will in the Spiritual Planets (not in the material creation though). 

The jiva souls in their full potential in both Vaikuntha and Goloka-Vrindavana, are individual  living entities with their own sense of self, personality, individuality and character eternally who can choose for themselves how to serve Krishna or even not serve Him if they choose.

The marginal living entities are also known as the jiva tattva, jiva soul or jivatma, they have their own "sense of individual self" that is independent and separate from Krishna's personality, therefore, they are their own person yet always fully dependent on Krishna's energies, whether in the Spiritual or material worlds.

In this way, all jiva-tattva souls have free will eternally as part of their marginal make up that allows them to have the ability to choose for themselves in both Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavan as part of their marginal constitution.

This means, as separate thinking living entities, they can choose to be with Krishna or Vishnu, or reject the Lord and enter the material creation.

Such freedom ONLY fully exists in Vaikuntha and Goloka Vrindavana

Freedom does not exist in the material creation, as soo as the jiva-tattva soul takes a material bodily vessel, the embodied soul becomes under the influence of material nature which is the instincts od eating, sleeping, mating and defending.

And because time is divided into past, present and future, the reaction to each material bodynis birth, youth, middle age, old age and death.

Material time means material creation is in a constant progression of decomposition and decaying, nothing lasts in the material creation, everything eventually fades away in oblivion (decays)  

Eventually in the material creation, the trapped jiva soul in a material bodily container, becomes frustrated with the temporary nature of material life, they therefore can choose to escape the material creation and enter the impersonal Brahmajyoti effulgence and hover inactively their in a dormant state for billions of years if they want.

However, merging into the impersonal Brahmajyoti as an individual unit is only temporary, even if one believes its for eternity.

Eventually ALL jiva souls fall down from the impersonal Brahmajyoti or Brahman effulgence because it is NOT permanent, or one's original position, and again take birth in lower species of material life.

From there, they have to progress within nature, and move through the cycle of birth and death, back to the human species where again they can have the opportunity to realize "their full potential" as a spiritual individual personal living being under the guidance of a bonafide Spiritual Master like Srila Prabhupada.

Fortunately for most jiva souls or marginal living entities, over 90%, according to Srila Prabhupada, NEVER make that foolish choice and enter the mundane decaying material creation.

From the Book "Teachings of Lord Caitanya"

Srila Prabhupada - "There are also forms of Kṛṣṇa that are a little different from His original form, and these are called tad-ekātma-rūpa forms. These may be further divided into the vilāsa and svāṁśa forms, which in turn have many different features and can be divided into prābhava and vaibhava forms.

As far as the vilāsa forms are concerned, there are innumerable prābhava-vilāsas, headed by Kṛṣṇa's expansions as -

Vāsudeva, 

Saṅkarṣaṇa, 

Pradyumna,

Aniruddha. 

Sometimes the Lord thinks of Himself as a cowherd boy, and sometimes He thinks of Himself as Vasudeva's son, a kṣatriya prince, and this "thinking" of Kṛṣṇa is called His "pastimes." Actually, He is in the same form in His vaibhava-prakāśa and prābhava-vilāsa, but He appears differently as Kṛṣṇa and Balarāma". (Teachings of Lord Caitanya)

The true history of Israel and Islam in the Middle East.

The true history of Israel and Islam in the Middle East.

Jewish presents in the Middle East has ALWAYS been Israeli land long before Islam even existed.

The Koran was written only in the 8th Century AD and Mohammed was born in the 6th Century (570 AD)

Islam is relatively new, it never existed until then, therefore they have no claim over Israel or Jerusalem.

The Jewish Torah, that includes the old testament of the Bible, was written 3000 years before Mohammed even came to this world in the 6th Century AD.

The fact is, Jerusalem has ALWAYS  been the capital of Israel going back over 4000 years.

Islam was a new violent cult that over ran the middle East with forced conversions that spread to parts of Europe and Asia, essentially India devastating and dividing India's Vedic culture, even the word "Hindu" is found nowhere in Vedic texts, it comes from invading Muslims.

And in 1947 the new now state of Israel took back what has ALWAYS been there land previously called Palestine.

Israel therefore need to also fully take back the Temple Mount and demolish what Islam structures that are there today.

The fact is, Muslims invaders from Saudi Arabia and forcefully built their Islamic structure over the sacred Jewish Temple Mount in the 8th Century.

Muslims have no claim over Israel and its capital Jerusalem. The original owners are the Jews by thousands of years.

Islam is only a very recent belief system only 1,300 years old.

Islam started in Mecca with the birth of Mohammad in 570 AD in what is today known as Saudia Arabia.

Therefore those history books who say Islam originated from Persia (Iran) are wrong, Islam originated from Saudi Arabia

The Koran was written by Mohammed between 610 AD and 632 AD he believed was instructions given by the Arch Angel Gabriel.

All Islam spread from Mecca, however, at first the people of Mecca (Meccans) rejected and fought Mohammed and his followers.

In 622 AD, Muhammad and his few hundred followers left Mecca and traveled to Yathrib (today is Medina Saudi Arabia), the oasis town where his father was buried.

The leaders there were suffering through a vicious civil war, and they had invited this man well known for his wisdom to act as their mediator.

Yathrib soon became known as Medina, the City of the Prophet.

Muhammad remained here for the next six years, building the first Muslim community and gradually gathering more and more people to his side. 

The Meccans (those who lived in Mecca Saudi Arabia) did not take Muhammad's new success lightly. Early skirmishes led to three major battles in the next three years.

Of these the Muslims won the first (the Battle of Badr, March, 624 AD), lost the second (the Battle of Uhud, March, 625 AD), and outlasted the third, (The Battle of the Trench and the Siege of Medina, April, 627 AD).

In March, 628 AD, a treaty was signed between the two sides, which recognized the Muslims as a new force in Arabia and gave them freedom to move unmolested throughout Arabia.

Meccan allies breached the treaty a year later. 

The Conquest of Mecca

By now, the balance of power had shifted radically away from once-powerful Mecca, toward Muhammad and the Muslims.

In January, 630 AD, they marched on Mecca and were joined by tribe after tribe along the way. They entered Mecca without bloodshed and the Meccans, seeing the tide had turned, joined them. 

Muhammad's Final Years

Muhammad returned to live in Medina. In the next three years, he consolidated most of the Arabian Peninsula under Islam.

In March, 632 AD, he returned to Mecca one last time to perform a pilgrimage, and tens of thousands of Muslims joined him.

After the pilgrimage, he returned to Medina. Three months later on June 8, 632 AD he died there, after a brief illness.

He is buried in the mosque in Medina. Within a hundred years Muhammad's teaching and way of life had spread from the remote corners of Arabia as far east as Indo-China and as far west as Morocco, France and Spain. 

Caitanya Caritamrita Adi Lila Chapter 5 Part 2. This chapter describes the essential nature and glories of Śrī Nityānanda Prabhu, an expansion of Lord Balarama.

Caitanya Caritamrita Adi Lila Chapter 5 Part 2, Text 31 to text 60

By His Divine Grace AC Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada.

The Glories of Lord Nityānanda Balarāma

This chapter is chiefly devoted to describing the essential nature and glories of Śrī Nityānanda Prabhu.

Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa is the absolute Personality of Godhead, and His first expansion in a form for pastimes is Śrī Balarāma.

TEXT 31

Those who attain brahma-sāyujya liberation cannot gain entrance into Vaikuṇṭha; their residence is outside the Vaikuṇṭha planets.

TEXT 32

Outside the Vaikuṇṭha planets is the atmosphere of the glowing effulgence, which consists of the supremely bright rays of the body of Lord Kṛṣṇa.

TEXT 33

That region is called Siddhaloka, and it is beyond the material nature. Its essence is spiritual, but it does not have spiritual varieties.

TEXT 34

It is like the homogeneous effulgence around the sun. But inside the sun are the chariots, horses and other opulences of the sun-god.

PURPORT

Outside of Vaikuṇṭha, the abode of Kṛṣṇa, which is called paravyoma, is the glaring effulgence of Kṛṣṇa's bodily rays. This is called the brahmajyoti.

The transcendental region of that effulgence is called Siddhaloka or Brahmaloka. When impersonalists achieve liberation, they merge into that Brahmaloka effulgence.

This transcendental region is undoubtedly spiritual, but it contains no manifestations of spiritual activities or variegatedness.

It is compared to the glow of the sun.

Within the sun's glow is the sphere of the sun, where one can experience all sorts of varieties.

TEXT 35

"As through devotion to the Lord one can attain His abode, many have attained that goal by abandoning their sinful activities and absorbing their minds in the Lord through lust, envy, fear or affection."

PURPORT

As the powerful sun, by its glowing rays, can purify all kinds of impurities, so the all-spiritual Personality of Godhead can purify all material qualities in a person He attracts.

Even if one is attracted by Godhead in the mode of material lust, such attraction is converted into spiritual love of Godhead by His grace. Similarly, if one is related to the Lord in fear and animosity, he also becomes purified by the spiritual attraction of the Lord.

Although God is great and the living entity small, they are spiritual individuals, and therefore as soon as there is a reciprocal exchange by the living entity's free will, at once the great spiritual being attracts the small living entity, thus freeing him from all material bondage. This is a verse from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (7.1.30).

TEXT 36

"Where it has been stated that the Lord's enemies and devotees attain the same destination, this refers to the ultimate oneness of Brahman and Lord Kṛṣṇa. This may be understood by the example of the sun and the sunshine, in which Brahman is like the sunshine and Kṛṣṇa Himself is like the sun."

PURPORT

This verse is from the Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu (1.2.278) of Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, who further discusses this same topic in his Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta (Pūrva 5.41).

There he refers to the Viṣṇu Purāṇa (4.15.1), where Maitreya Muni asked Parāśara, in regard to Jaya and Vijaya, how it was that Hiraṇyakaśipu next became Rāvaṇa and enjoyed more material happiness than the demigods but did not attain salvation, although when he became Śiśupāla, quarreled with Kṛṣṇa and was killed, he attained salvation and merged into the body of Lord Kṛṣṇa. 

Parāśara replied that Hiraṇyakaśipu failed to recognize Lord Nṛsiṁhadeva as Lord Viṣṇu. He thought that Nṛsiṁhadeva was some living entity who had acquired such opulence by various pious activities.

Being overcome by the mode of passion, he considered Lord Nṛsiṁhadeva an ordinary living entity, not understanding His form. Nevertheless, because Hiraṇyakaśipu was killed by the hands of Lord Nṛsiṁhadeva, in his next life he became Rāvaṇa and had proprietorship of unlimited opulence.

As Rāvaṇa, with unlimited material enjoyment, he could not accept Lord Rāma as the Personality of Godhead. Therefore even though he was killed by Rāma, he did not attain sāyujya, or oneness with the body of the Lord.

In his Rāvaṇa body he was too much attracted to Rāma's wife, Jānakī, and because of that attraction he was able to see Lord Rāma. But instead of accepting Lord Rāma as an incarnation of Viṣṇu, Rāvaṇa thought Him an ordinary living being.

When killed by the hands of Rāma, therefore, he got the privilege of taking birth as Śiśupāla, who had such immense opulence that he could think himself a competitor to Kṛṣṇa.

Although Śiśupāla was always envious of Kṛṣṇa, he frequently uttered the name of Kṛṣṇa and always thought of the beautiful features of Kṛṣṇa.

Thus by constantly thinking and chanting of Kṛṣṇa, even unfavorably, he was cleansed of the contamination of his sinful activities. When Śiśupāla was killed by the Sudarśana cakra of Kṛṣṇa as an enemy, his constant remembrance of Kṛṣṇa dissolved the reactions of his vices, and he attained salvation by becoming one with the body of the Lord.

From this incident one can understand that even a person who thinks of Kṛṣṇa as an enemy and is killed by Him may be liberated by becoming one with the body of Kṛṣṇa. What then must be the destination of devotees who always think favorably of Kṛṣṇa as their master or friend?

These devotees must attain a situation better than Brahmaloka, the impersonal bodily effulgence of Kṛṣṇa.

Devotees cannot be situated in the impersonal Brahman effulgence, into which impersonalists desire to merge. The devotees are placed in Vaikuṇṭhaloka or Kṛṣṇaloka.

This discussion between Maitreya Muni and Parāśara Muni centered on whether devotees come down into the material world in every millennium like Jaya and Vijaya, who were cursed by the Kumāras to that effect.

In the course of these instructions to Maitreya about Hiraṇyakaśipu, Rāvaṇa and Śiśupāla, Parāśara did not say that these demons were formerly Jaya and Vijaya. He simply described the transmigration through three lives.

It is not necessary for the Vaikuṇṭha associates of the Supreme Personality of Godhead to come to take the roles of His enemies in all the millenniums in which He appears. 

The "falldown" of Jaya and Vijaya occurred in a particular millennium; Jaya and Vijaya do not come down in every millennium to act as demons. 

To think that some associates of the Lord fall down from Vaikuṇṭha in every millennium to become demons is totally incorrect.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead has all the tendencies that may be found in the living entity, for He is the chief living entity.

Therefore it is natural that sometimes Lord Viṣṇu wants to fight. Just as He has the tendencies to create, to enjoy, to be a friend, to accept a mother and father, and so on, He also has the tendency to fight.

Sometimes important landlords and kings keep wrestlers with whom they practice mock fighting, and Viṣṇu makes similar arrangements. The demons who fight with the Supreme Personality of Godhead in the material world are sometimes His associates.

When there is a scarcity of demons and the Lord wants to fight, He instigates some of His associates of Vaikuṇṭha to come and play as demons.

When it is said that Śiśupāla merged into the body of Kṛṣṇa, it should be noted that in this case he was not Jaya or Vijaya; he was actually a demon.

In his Bṛhad-bhāgavatāmṛta, Śrīla Sanātana Gosvāmī has explained that the attainment of salvation by merging into the Brahman effulgence of the Lord cannot be accepted as the highest success in life, because demons like Kaṁsa, who were famous for killing brāhmaṇas and cows, attained that salvation.

For devotees such salvation is abominable. Devotees are actually in a transcendental position, whereas nondevotees are candidates for hellish conditions of life.

There is always a difference between the life of a devotee and the life of a demon, and their realizations are as different as heaven and hell. Demons are always accustomed to be malicious toward devotees and to kill brāhmaṇas and cows.

For demons, merging in the Brahman effulgence may be very glorious, but for devotees it is hellish. A devotee's aim in life is to attain perfection in loving the Supreme Personality of Godhead. 

Those who aspire to merge into the Brahman effulgence are as abominable as demons. Devotees who aspire to associate with the Supreme Lord to render Him transcendental loving service are far superior.

TEXT 37

Thus in the spiritual sky there are varieties of pastimes within the spiritual energy. Outside the Vaikuṇṭha planets appears the impersonal reflection of light.

TEXT 38

That impersonal Brahman effulgence consists only of the effulgent rays of the Lord. Those fit for sāyujya liberation merge into that effulgence.

TEXT 39

"Beyond the region of ignorance [the material cosmic manifestation] lies the realm of Siddhaloka. The Siddhas reside there, absorbed in the bliss of Brahman. Demons killed by the Lord also attain that realm."

PURPORT

Tamas means darkness. The material world is dark, and beyond the material world is light. In other words, after passing through the entire material atmosphere, one can come to the luminous spiritual sky, whose impersonal effulgence is known as Siddhaloka. 

Māyāvādī philosophers who aspire to merge with the body of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, as well as demoniac persons who are killed by Kṛṣṇa, such as Kaṁsa and Śiśupāla, enter that Brahman effulgence. 

Yogīs who attain oneness through meditation according to the Patañjali yoga system also reach Siddhaloka. This is a verse from the Brahmāṇḍa Purāṇa.

TEXT 40

In that spiritual sky, on the four sides of Nārāyaṇa, are the second expansions of the quadruple expansions of Dvārakā.

PURPORT

Within the spiritual sky is a second manifestation of the quadruple forms of Dvārakā from the abode of Kṛṣṇa.

Among these forms, which are all spiritual and immune to the material modes, Śrī Baladeva is represented as Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa.

The actions in the spiritual sky are manifested by the internal potency in pure spiritual existence. They expand in six transcendental opulences, which are all manifestations of Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa, who is the ultimate reservoir and objective of all living entities.

Although belonging to the marginal potency known as jīva-śakti, the spiritual sparks known as the living entities are subjected to the conditions of material energy.

It is because these sparks are related with both the internal and external potencies of the Lord that they are known as belonging to the marginal potency.

In considering the quadruple forms of the absolute Personality of Godhead, known as 

1 - Vāsudeva, 
2 - Saṅkarṣaṇa, 
3 - Pradyumna,
4 - Aniruddha.

The impersonalists, headed by Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya, have interpreted the aphorisms of the Vedānta-sūtra in a way suitable for the impersonalist school. 

To provide the intrinsic import of such aphorisms, however, Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, the leader of the six Gosvāmīs of Vṛndāvana, has properly replied to the impersonalists in his Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta, which is a natural commentary on the aphorisms of the Vedānta-sūtra.

The Padma Purāṇa, as quoted by Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī in his Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta, describes that in the spiritual sky there are four directions, corresponding to east, west, north and south, in which Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Aniruddha and Pradyumna are situated. The same forms are also situated in the material sky. 

The Padma Purāṇa also describes a place in the spiritual sky known as Vedavatī-pura, where Vāsudeva resides. In Viṣṇuloka, which is above Satyaloka, Saṅkarṣaṇa resides.

Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa is another name of Saṅkarṣaṇa. Pradyumna lives in Dvārakā-pura, Aniruddha lies on the eternal bed of Śeṣa, generally known as ananta-śayyā, on the island called Śvetadvīpa, in the ocean of milk.

TEXT 41

Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha constitute this second quadruple. They are purely transcendental.

PURPORT

Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has misleadingly explained the quadruple form (catur-vyūha) in his interpretation of the forty-second aphorism of Chapter Two of the second khaṇḍa of the Vedānta-sūtra (utpatty-asambhavāt).

In verses 41 through 47 of this chapter of Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta, Śrīla Kṛṣṇadāsa Kavirāja Gosvāmī answers Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya's misleading objections to the personal feature of the Absolute Truth.

The Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Absolute Truth, is not like a material object that can be known by experimental knowledge or sense perception.

In the Nārada-pañcarātra this fact has been explained by Nārāyaṇa Himself to Lord Śiva.

But Śaṅkarācārya, the incarnation of Śiva, under the order of Nārāyaṇa, his master, had to mislead the monists, who favor ultimate extinction.

In the conditioned stage of existence, all living entities have four basic defects, of which one is the cheating propensity.

Śaṅkarācārya has carried this cheating propensity to the extreme to mislead the monists.

Actually, the quadruple forms explained in the Vedic literature cannot be understood by the speculation of a conditioned soul. The quadruple forms should therefore be accepted just as They are described.

The authority of the Vedas is such that even if one does not understand something by his limited perception, he should accept the Vedic injunction and not create interpretations to suit his imperfect understanding. In his Śārīraka-bhāṣya, however, Śaṅkarācārya has increased the misunderstanding of the monists.

The quadruple forms have a spiritual existence that can be realized in vāsudeva-sattva (śuddha-sattva), or unqualified goodness, which accompanies complete absorption in the understanding of Vāsudeva.

The quadruple forms, who are full of the six opulences of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, are the enjoyers of the internal potency.

Thinking the absolute Personality of Godhead to be poverty-stricken or to have no potency-or, in other words, to be impotent-is simply rascaldom.

This rascaldom is the profession of the conditioned soul, and it increases his bewilderment. One who cannot understand the distinctions between the spiritual world and the material world has no qualification to examine or know the situation of the transcendental quadruple forms.

In his commentary on Vedānta-sūtra 2.2.42-45, His Holiness Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has made a futile attempt to nullify the existence of these quadruple forms in the spiritual world.

Śaṅkarācārya says (sūtra 42) that devotees think the Supreme Personality of Godhead Vāsudeva, Śrī Kṛṣṇa, to be one, to be free from material qualities and to have a transcendental body full of bliss and eternal existence.

He is the ultimate goal of the devotees, who believe that the Supreme Personality of Godhead expands Himself into four other eternal transcendental forms-Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha.

From Vāsudeva, who is the primary expansion, come Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha in that order.

Another name of Vāsudeva is Paramātmā, another name of Saṅkarṣaṇa is jīva (the living entity), another name of Pradyumna is mind, and another name of Aniruddha is ahaṅkāra (false ego). Among these expansions, Vāsudeva is considered the origin of material nature.

Therefore Śaṅkarācārya says that Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha must be creations of that original cause.

Great souls assert that Nārāyaṇa, who is known as Paramātmā, the Supersoul, is beyond material nature, and this is in accordance with the statements of the Vedic literature. Māyāvādīs also agree that Nārāyaṇa can expand Himself in various forms.

Śaṅkara says that he does not attempt to argue that portion of the devotees' understanding, but he must protest the idea that Saṅkarṣaṇa is produced from Vāsudeva, Pradyumna is produced from Saṅkarṣaṇa, and Aniruddha is produced from Pradyumna, for if Saṅkarṣaṇa is understood to represent the living entities created from the body of Vāsudeva, the living entities would have to be noneternal.

The living entities are supposed to be freed from material contamination by engaging in prolonged temple worship of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, reading Vedic literature and performing yoga and pious activities to attain the Supreme Lord.

But if the living entities had been created from material nature at a certain point, they would be noneternal and would have no chance to be liberated and associate with the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

When a cause is nullified, its results are nullified. In the second chapter of the Vedānta-sūtra's second khaṇḍa, Ācārya Vedavyāsa has also refuted the conception that the living beings were ever born (nātmā śruter nityatvāc ca tābhyaḥ). Because there is no creation for the living entities, they must be eternal.

Śaṅkarācārya says (sūtra 43) that devotees think that Pradyumna, who is considered to represent the senses, has sprung from Saṅkarṣaṇa, who is considered to represent the living entities. But we cannot actually experience that a person can produce senses.

Devotees also say that from Pradyumna has sprung Aniruddha, who is considered to represent the ego.

But Śaṅkarācārya says that unless the devotees can show how ego and the means of knowledge can generate from a person, such an explanation of the Vedānta-sūtra cannot be accepted, for no other philosophers accept the sūtras in that way.

Śaṅkarācārya also says (sūtra 44) that he cannot accept the devotees' idea that Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are equally as powerful as the absolute Personality of Godhead, full in the six opulences of knowledge, wealth, strength, fame, beauty and renunciation, and free from the flaw of generation at a certain point. 

Even if They are full expansions, the flaw of generation remains. Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha, being distinct individual persons, cannot be one. Therefore if They are accepted as absolute, full and equal, there would have to be many Personalities of Godhead.

But there is no need to accept that there are many Personalities of Godhead, because acceptance of one omnipotent God is sufficient for all purposes.

The acceptance of more than one God is contradictory to the conclusion that Lord Vāsudeva, the absolute Personality of Godhead, is one without a second.

Even if we agree to accept that the quadruple forms of Godhead are all identical, we cannot avoid the incongruous flaw of noneternity.

Unless we accept that there are some differences among the personalities, there is no meaning to the idea that Saṅkarṣaṇa is an expansion of Vāsudeva, Pradyumna is an expansion of Saṅkarṣaṇa, and Aniruddha is an expansion of Pradyumna.

There must be a distinction between cause and effect. For example, a pot is distinct from the earth from which it is made, and therefore we can ascertain that the earth is the cause and the pot is the effect.

Without such distinctions, there is no meaning to cause and effect. Furthermore, the followers of the Pañcarātric principles do not accept any differences in knowledge and qualities between Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha.

The devotees accept all these expansions to be one, but why should they restrict oneness to these quadruple expansions? Certainly we should not do so, for all living entities, from Brahmā to the insignificant ant, are expansions of Vāsudeva, as accepted in all the śrutis and smṛtis.

Śaṅkarācārya also says (sūtra 45) that the devotees who follow the Pañcarātra state that God's qualities and God Himself, as the owner of the qualities, are the same.

But how can the Bhāgavata school state that the six opulences-wisdom, wealth, strength, fame, beauty and renunciation-are identical with Lord Vāsudeva? This is impossible.

In his Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta (Pūrva 5.165-193), Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī has refuted the charges directed against the devotees by Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya regarding their explanation of the quadruple forms Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. He says that these four expansions of Nārāyaṇa are present in the spiritual sky, where They are famous as Mahāvastha.

Among Them, Vāsudeva is worshiped within the heart by meditation because He is the predominating Deity of the heart, as explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (4.3.23).

Saṅkarṣaṇa, the second expansion, is Vāsudeva's personal expansion for pastimes, and since He is the reservoir of all living entities, He is sometimes called jīva.

The beauty of Saṅkarṣaṇa is more than that of innumerable full moons radiating light beams. He is worshipable as the principle of ego. He has invested Anantadeva with all the potencies of sustenance.

For the dissolution of the creation, He also exhibits Himself as the Supersoul in Rudra, irreligiosity, sarpa (the snake), antaka (death) and the demons.

Pradyumna, the third manifestation, appears from Saṅkarṣaṇa. Those who are especially intelligent worship this Pradyumna expansion of Saṅkarṣaṇa as the principle of the intelligence.

The goddess of fortune always chants the glories of Pradyumna in the place known as Ilāvṛta-varṣa, and she always serves Him with great devotion.

His complexion appears sometimes golden and sometimes bluish like new monsoon clouds in the sky. He is the origin of the creation of the material world, and He has invested His creative principle in Cupid. It is by His direction only that all men and demigods and other living entities function with energy for regeneration.

Aniruddha, the fourth of the quadruple expansions, is worshiped by great sages and psychologists as the principle of the mind. His complexion is similar to the bluish hue of a blue cloud.

He engages in the maintenance of the cosmic manifestation and is the Supersoul of Dharma (the deity of religiosity), the Manus (the progenitors of mankind) and the devatās (demigods).

The Mokṣa-dharma Vedic scripture indicates that Pradyumna is the Deity of the total mind, whereas Aniruddha is the Deity of the total ego, but previous statements regarding the quadruple forms are confirmed in the Pañcarātra tantras in all respects.

In the Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta (Pūrva 5.86-100), there is a lucid explanation of the inconceivable potencies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Negating Śaṅkarācārya's statements, the Mahā-varāha Purāṇa declares:

sarve nityāḥ śāśvatāś ca
dehās tasya parātmanaḥ
hānopādāna-rahitā
naiva prakṛti-jāḥ kvacit

"All the varied expansions of the Personality of Godhead are transcendental and eternal, and all of them repeatedly descend to all the different universes of the material creation.

Their bodies, composed of eternity, bliss and knowledge, are everlasting; there is no chance of their decaying, for they are not creations of the material world.

Their forms are concentrated spiritual existence, always complete with all spiritual qualities and devoid of material contamination."

Confirming these statements, the Nārada-pañcarātra asserts:

maṇir yathā vibhāgena
nīla-pītādibhir yutaḥ
rūpa-bhedam avāpnoti
dhyāna-bhedāt tathācyutaḥ

"The infallible Personality of Godhead can manifest His body in different ways according to different modes of worship, just as the vaidūrya gem can manifest itself in various colors, such as blue and yellow."

Each incarnation is distinct from all the others. This is possible by the Lord's inconceivable potency, by which He can simultaneously represent Himself as one, as various partial forms and as the origin of these partial forms. Nothing is impossible for His inconceivable potencies.

Kṛṣṇa is one without a second, but He manifests Himself in different bodies, as stated by Nārada in the Tenth Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam:

citraṁ bataitad ekena
vapuṣā yugapat pṛthak
gṛheṣu dvy-aṣṭa-sāhasraṁ
striya eka udāvahat

"It is wonderful indeed that one Kṛṣṇa has simultaneously become different Kṛṣṇas in 16,000 palaces to accept 16,000 queens as His wives." (Bhāg. 10.69.2) The Padma Purāṇa also explains:

sa devo bahudhā bhūtvā
nirguṇaḥ puruṣottamaḥ
ekī-bhūya punaḥ śete
nirdoṣo harir ādi-kṛt

"The same Personality of Godhead, Puruṣottama, the original person, who is always devoid of material qualities and contamination, can exhibit Himself in various forms and at the same time lie down in one form."

In the Tenth Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam it is said, yajanti tvan-mayās tvāṁ vai bahu-mūrty-eka-mūrtikam: "O my Lord, although You manifest Yourself in varieties of forms, You are one without a second. Therefore pure devotees concentrate upon You and worship only You." (Bhāg. 10.40.7) In the Kūrma Purāṇa it is said:

asthūlaś cānaṇuś caiva
sthūlo 'ṇuś caiva sarvataḥ
avarṇaḥ sarvataḥ proktaḥ
śyāmo raktānta-locanaḥ

"The Lord is personal although impersonal, He is atomic although great, and He is blackish and has red eyes although He is colorless."

By material calculation all this may appear contradictory, but if we understand that the Supreme Personality of Godhead has inconceivable potencies, we can accept these facts as eternally possible in Him.

In our present condition we cannot understand the spiritual activities and how they occur, but although they are inconceivable in the material context, we should not disregard such contradictory conceptions.

Although it is apparently inconceivable, it is quite possible for the Absolute to reconcile all opposing elements. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam establishes this in the Sixth Canto (6.9.34-37):

"O my Lord, Your transcendental pastimes and enjoyments all appear inconceivable because they are not limited by the causal and effective actions of material thought. You can do everything without performing bodily work.

The Vedas say that the Absolute Truth has multifarious potencies and does not need to do anything personally. My dear Lord, You are entirely devoid of material qualities. Without anyone's help, You can create, maintain and dissolve the entire qualitative material manifestation, yet in all such activities You do not change.

You do not accept the results of Your activities, unlike ordinary demons and demigods, who suffer or enjoy the reactions of their activities in the material world. Unaffected by the reactions of work, You eternally exist with Your full spiritual potency. This we cannot fully understand.

"Because You are unlimited in Your six opulences, no one can count Your transcendental qualities. Philosophers and other thoughtful persons are overwhelmed by the contradictory manifestations of the physical world and the propositions of logical arguments and judgments.

Because they are bewildered by word jugglery and disturbed by the different calculations of the scriptures, their theories cannot touch You, who are the ruler and controller of everyone and whose glories are beyond conception.

"Your inconceivable potency keeps You unattached to the mundane qualities. Surpassing all conceptions of material contemplation, Your pure transcendental knowledge keeps You beyond all speculative processes. By Your inconceivable potency, there is nothing contradictory in You.

"People may sometimes think of You as impersonal or personal, but You are one. For persons who are confused or bewildered, a rope may manifest itself as different kinds of snakes. For similar confused persons who are uncertain about You, You create various philosophical methods in pursuance of their uncertain positions."

We should always remember the differences between spiritual and material actions. The Supreme Lord, being all-spiritual, can perform any act without extraneous help. In the material world, if we want to manufacture an earthen pot, we need the ingredients, a machine and also a laborer.

But we should not extend this idea to the actions of the Supreme Lord, for He can create anything in a moment without that which appears necessary in our own conception.

When the Lord appears as an incarnation to fulfill a particular purpose, this does not indicate that He is unable to fulfill it without appearing. He can do anything simply by His will, but by His causeless mercy He appears to be dependent upon His devotees.

He appears as the son of Yaśodāmātā not because He is dependent on her care but because He accepts such a role by His causeless mercy. When He appears for the protection of His devotees, He naturally accepts trials and tribulations on their behalf.

In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that the Lord, being equally disposed toward every living being, has no enemies and no friends but He has special affection for a devotee who always thinks of Him in love.

Therefore neutrality and partiality are both among the transcendental qualities of the Lord, and they are properly adjusted by His inconceivable energy.

The Lord is Parabrahman, or the source of the impersonal Brahma, which is His all-pervading feature of neutrality. In His personal feature, however, as the owner of all transcendental opulences, the Lord displays His partiality by taking the side of His devotees.

Partiality, neutrality and all such qualities are present in God; otherwise they could not be experienced in the creation. Since He is the total existence, all things are properly adjusted in the Absolute.

In the relative world such qualities are displayed in a perverted manner, and therefore we experience nonduality as a perverted reflection. Because there is no logic to explain how things happen in the realm of spirit, the Lord is sometimes described as being beyond the range of experience.

But if we simply accept the Lord's inconceivability, we can then adjust all things in Him. Nondevotees cannot understand the Lord's inconceivable energy, and consequently for them it is said that He is beyond the range of conceivable expression.

The author of the Brahma-sūtras accepts this fact and says, śrutes tu śabda-mūlatvāt: the Supreme Personality of Godhead, being inconceivable to an ordinary man, can be understood only through the evidence of the Vedic injunctions.

The Skanda Purāṇa confirms, acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet:

"Matters inconceivable to a common man should not be a subject for argument." We find very wonderful qualities even in material jewels and drugs. Indeed, their qualities often appear inconceivable.

Therefore if we do not attribute inconceivable potencies to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, we cannot establish His supremacy. It is because of these inconceivable potencies that the glories of the Lord have always been accepted as difficult to understand.

Ignorance and the jugglery of words are very common in human society, but they do not help one understand the inconceivable energies of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If we accept such ignorance and word jugglery, we cannot accept the Supreme Lord's perfection in six opulences.

For example, one of the opulences of the Supreme Lord is complete knowledge. Therefore, how could ignorance be conceivable in Him?

Vedic instructions and sensible arguments establish that the Lord's maintaining the cosmic manifestation and simultaneously being indifferent to the activities of its maintenance cannot be contradictory, because of His inconceivable energies.

To a person who is always absorbed in the thought of snakes, a rope always appears to be a snake, and similarly to a person bewildered by material qualities and devoid of knowledge of the Absolute, the Supreme Personality of Godhead appears according to diverse bewildered conclusions.

Someone might argue that the Absolute would be affected by duality if He were both all-cognizance (Brahman) and the Personality of Godhead with six opulences in full (Bhagavān).

To refute such an argument, the aphorism svarūpa-dvayam īkṣyate declares that in spite of appearances, there is no chance of duality in the Absolute, for He is but one in diverse manifestations.

Understanding that the Absolute displays varied pastimes by the influence of His energies at once removes the apparent incongruity of His inconceivably opposite energies. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (3.4.16) gives the following description of the inconceivable potency of the Lord:

karmāṇy anīhasya bhavo 'bhavasya te
durgāśrayo 'thāri-bhayāt palāyanam
kālātmano yat pramadā-yutāśrayaḥ
svātman-rateḥ khidyati dhīr vidām iha

"Although the Supreme Personality of Godhead has nothing to do, He nevertheless acts; although He is always unborn, He nevertheless takes birth; although He is time, fearful to everyone,

He flees Mathurā in fear of His enemy to take shelter in a fort; and although He is self-sufficient, He marries 16,000 women. These pastimes seem like bewildering contradictions, even to the most intelligent."

Had these activities of the Lord not been a reality, sages would not have been puzzled by them. Therefore such activities should never be considered imaginary. Whenever the Lord desires, His inconceivable energy (yogamāyā) serves Him in creating and performing such pastimes.

The scriptures known as the Pañcarātra-śāstras are recognized Vedic scriptures that have been accepted by the great ācāryas. These scriptures are not products of the modes of passion and ignorance. Learned scholars and brāhmaṇas therefore always refer to them as sātvata-saṁhitās.

The original speaker of these scriptures is Nārāyaṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is especially mentioned in the Mokṣa-dharma (349.68), which is part of the Śānti-parva of the Mahābhārata. Liberated sages like Nārada and Vyāsa, who are free from the four defects of conditioned souls, are the propagators of these scriptures.

Śrī Nārada Muni is the original speaker of the Pañcarātra-śāstra. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is also considered a sātvata-saṁhitā. Indeed, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu declared, śrīmad-bhāgavataṁ purāṇam amalam: "Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is a spotless Purāṇa."

Malicious editors and scholars who attempt to misrepresent the Pañcarātra-śāstras to refute their regulations are most abominable.

In the modern age, such malicious scholars have even commented misleadingly upon the Bhagavad-gītā, which was spoken by Kṛṣṇa, to prove that there is no Kṛṣṇa. How the Māyāvādīs have misrepresented the pāñcarātrika-vidhi will be shown below.

(1) In commenting on Vedānta-sūtra 2.2.42, Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has claimed that Saṅkarṣaṇa is a jīva, an ordinary living entity, but there is no evidence in any Vedic scripture that devotees of the Lord have ever said that Saṅkarṣaṇa is an ordinary living entity.

He is an infallible plenary expansion of the Supreme Personality of Godhead in the Viṣṇu category, and He is beyond the creation of material nature. He is the original source of the living entities. The Upaniṣads declare, nityo nityānāṁ cetanaś cetanānām: "He is the supreme living entity among all the living entities."

Therefore He is vibhu-caitanya, the greatest. He is directly the cause of the cosmic manifestation and the infinitesimal living beings. He is the infinite living entity, and ordinary living entities are infinitesimal.

Therefore He is never to be considered an ordinary living being, for that would be against the conclusion of the authorized scriptures. The living entities are also beyond the limitations of birth and death.

This is the version of the Vedas, and it is accepted by those who follow scriptural injunctions and who have actually descended in the disciplic succession.

(2) In answer to Śaṅkarācārya's commentary on Vedānta-sūtra 2.2.43, it must be said that the original Viṣṇu of all the Viṣṇu categories, which are distributed in several ways, is Mūla-saṅkarṣaṇa. Mūla means "the original." Saṅkarṣaṇa is also Viṣṇu, but from Him all other Viṣṇus expand.

This is confirmed in the Brahma-saṁhitā, wherein it is said that just as a flame transferred from another flame acts like the original, so the Viṣṇus who emanate from Mūlasaṅkarṣaṇa are as good as the original Viṣṇu. One should worship that Supreme Personality of Godhead, Govinda, who thus expands Himself.

(3) In reply to the commentary of Śaṅkarācārya on the forty-fourth aphorism, it may be said that no pure devotees strictly following the principles of Pañcarātra will ever accept the statement that all the expansions of Viṣṇu are different identities, for this idea is completely false.

Even Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya, in his commentary on the forty-second aphorism, has accepted that the Personality of Godhead can automatically expand Himself variously. Therefore his commentary on the forty-second aphorism and his commentary on the forty-fourth aphorism are contradictory.

It is a defect of Māyāvāda commentaries that they make one statement in one place and a contradictory statement in another place as a tactic to refute the Bhāgavata school.

Thus Māyāvādī commentators do not even follow regulative principles. It should be noted that the Bhāgavata school accepts the quadruple forms of Nārāyaṇa, but that does not mean that it accepts many Gods. 

Devotees know perfectly well that the Absolute Truth, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is one without a second. They are never pantheists, worshipers of many Gods, for this is against the injunction of the Vedas.

Devotees completely believe, with strong faith, that Nārāyaṇa is transcendental and has inconceivable proprietorship of various transcendental potencies. We therefore recommend that scholars consult the Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta of Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, where these ideas are explicitly stated.

Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has tried to prove that Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha expand through cause and effect. He has compared Them with earth and earthen pots. That is completely ignorant, however, for there is no such thing as cause and effect in Their expansions (nānyad yat sad-asat-param).

The Kūrma Purāṇa also confirms, deha-dehi-vibhedo 'yaṁ neśvare vidyate kvacit:

"There is no difference between body and soul in the Supreme Personality of Godhead." Cause and effect are material. For example, it is seen that a father's body is the cause of a son's body, but the soul is neither cause nor effect.

On the spiritual platform there are none of the differences we find in cause and effect. Since all the forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are spiritually supreme, They are equally controllers of material nature. Standing on the fourth dimension,

They are predominating figures on the transcendental platform. There is no trace of material contamination in Their expansions because material laws cannot influence Them. There is no such rule as cause and effect outside of the material world.

Therefore the understanding of cause and effect cannot approach the full, transcendental, complete expansions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Vedic literature proves this:

oṁ pūrṇam adaḥ pūrṇam idaṁ
pūrṇāt pūrṇam udacyate
pūrṇasya pūrṇam ādāya
pūrṇam evāvaśiṣyate

"The Personality of Godhead is perfect and complete, and because He is completely perfect, all emanations from Him, such as this phenomenal world, are perfectly equipped as complete wholes.

Whatever is produced of the complete whole is also complete by itself. Because He is the complete whole, even though so many complete units emanate from Him, He remains the complete balance." (Bṛhad-āraṇyaka Upaniṣad 5.1)

It is most apparent that nondevotees violate the rules and regulations of devotional service to equate the whole cosmic manifestation, which is the external feature of Viṣṇu, with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is the controller of māyā, or with His quadruple expansions.

The equalization of māyā and spirit, or māyā and the Lord, is a sign of atheism. The cosmic creation, which manifests life in forms from Brahmā to the ant, is the external feature of the Supreme Lord. It comprises one fourth of the Lord's energy, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā (ekāṁśena sthito jagat).

The cosmic manifestation of the illusory energy is material nature, and everything within material nature is made of matter.

Therefore, one should not try to compare the expansions of material nature to the catur-vyūha, the quadruple expansions of the Personality of Godhead, but unfortunately the Māyāvādī school unreasonably attempts to do this.

(4) To answer Śaṅkarācārya's commentary on Vedānta-sūtra 2.2.45, the substance of the transcendental qualities and their spiritual nature is described in the Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta (Pūrva 5.208-214) as follows:

"Some say that transcendence must be void of all qualities because qualities are manifested only in matter. According to them, all qualities are like temporary, flickering mirages.

But this is not acceptable. Since the Supreme Personality of Godhead is absolute, His qualities are nondifferent from Him. His form, name, qualities and everything else pertaining to Him are as spiritual as He is.

Every qualitative expansion of the absolute Personality of Godhead is identical with Him. Since the Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead, is the reservoir of all pleasure, all the transcendental qualities that expand from Him are also reservoirs of pleasure.

This is confirmed in the scripture known as Brahma-tarka, which states that the Supreme Lord Hari is qualified by Himself, and therefore Viṣṇu and His pure devotees and their transcendental qualities cannot be different from their persons.

In the Viṣṇu Purāṇa Lord Viṣṇu is worshiped in the following words:

'Let the Supreme Personality of Godhead be merciful toward us.

His existence is never infected by material qualities.' In the same Viṣṇu Purāṇa it is also said that all the qualities attributed to the Supreme Lord, such as knowledge, opulence, beauty, strength and influence, are known to be nondifferent from Him.

This is also confirmed in the Padma Purāṇa, which explains that whenever the Supreme Lord is described as having no qualities, this should be understood to indicate that He is devoid of material qualities.

In the First Chapter of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (1.16.29) it is said: 'O Dharma, protector of religious principles, all noble and sublime qualities are eternally manifested in the person of Kṛṣṇa, and devotees and transcendentalists who aspire to become faithful also desire to possess such transcendental qualities.' "

It is therefore to be understood that Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the transcendental form of absolute bliss, is the fountainhead of all pleasurable transcendental qualities and inconceivable potencies.

In this connection we may recommend references to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Third Canto, Chapter Twenty-Six, verses 21, 25, 27 and 28.

Śrīpāda Rāmānujācārya has also refuted the arguments of Śaṅkara in his own commentary on the Vedānta-sūtra, which is known as the Śrī-bhāṣya: "Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya has tried to equate the Pañcarātras with the philosophy of the atheist Kapila, and thus he has tried to prove that the Pañcarātras contradict the Vedic injunctions.

The Pañcarātras state that the personality of jīva called Saṅkarṣaṇa has emerged from Vāsudeva, the supreme cause of all causes, that Pradyumna, the mind, has come from Saṅkarṣaṇa, and that Aniruddha, the ego, has come from Pradyumna.

But one cannot say that the living entity (jīva) takes birth or is created, for such a statement is against the injunction of the Vedas.

As stated in the Kaṭha Upaniṣad (2.18), living entities, as individual spiritual souls, can have neither birth nor death. All Vedic literature declares that the living entities are eternal. 

Therefore when it is said that Saṅkarṣaṇa is jīva, this indicates that He is the predominating Deity of the living entities. Similarly, Pradyumna is the predominating Deity of the mind, and Aniruddha is the predominating Deity of the ego.

It has been said that Pradyumna, the mind, was produced from Saṅkarṣaṇa. But if Saṅkarṣaṇa were a living entity, this could not be accepted, because a living entity cannot be the cause of the mind.

The Vedic injunctions state that everything-including life, mind and the senses-comes from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is impossible for the mind to be produced by a living entity, for the Vedas state that everything comes from the Absolute Truth, the Supreme Lord.

Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha have all the potent features of the absolute Personality of Godhead, according to the revealed scriptures, which contain undeniable facts that no one can refute. Therefore these quadruple forms are never to be considered ordinary living beings.

Each of Them is a plenary expansion of the Absolute Godhead, and thus each is identical with the Supreme Lord in knowledge, opulence, energy, influence, prowess and potencies.

The evidence of Pañcarātra cannot be neglected. Only untrained persons who have not genuinely studied the Pañcarātras think that the Pañcarātras contradict the śrutis regarding the birth or beginning of the living entity.

In this connection, we must accept the verdict of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which says:

"The absolute Personality of Godhead, who is known as Vāsudeva and who is very affectionate toward His surrendered devotees, expands Himself in quadruple forms who are subordinate to Him and at the same time identical with Him in all respects."

The Pauṣkara-saṁhitā states: 'The scriptures that recommend that brāhmaṇas worship the quadruple forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are called āgamas [authorized works of Vedic literature].'

In all Vaiṣṇava literature it is said that worshiping these quadruple forms is as good as worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead Vāsudeva, who in His different expansions, complete in six opulences, can accept offerings from His devotees of the results of their prescribed duties.

Worshiping the expansions for pastimes, such as Nṛsiṁha, Rāma, Śeṣa and Kūrma, promotes one to the worship of the Saṅkarṣaṇa quadruple. From that position one is raised to the platform of worshiping Vāsudeva, the Supreme Brahman.

In the Pauṣkara-saṁhitā it is said: 'If one fully worships according to the regulative principles, one can attain the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vāsudeva.'

It is to be accepted that Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are as good as Lord Vāsudeva, for They all have inconceivable power and can accept transcendental forms like

1 - Vāsudeva,
2 - Saṅkarṣaṇa, 
3 - Pradyumna, 
4 - Aniruddha.

All are never born, but They can manifest Themselves in various incarnations before the eyes of pure devotees.

This is the conclusion of all Vedic literature. That the Lord can manifest Himself before His devotees by His inconceivable power is not against the teaching of the Pañcarātra.

Since Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are actually the predominating Deities of all living entities, the total mind and the total ego, the descriptions of Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha as jīva, mind and ego are never contradictory to the statements of the scriptures.

These names identify these Deities, just as the terms 'sky' and 'light' sometimes identify the Absolute Brahman.

"The scriptures completely deny the birth or production of the living entity. In the Parama-saṁhitā it is described that material nature, which is used for others' purposes, is factually inert and always subject to transformation. 

The field of material nature is the arena of the activities of fruitive actors, and since the material field is externally related with the Supreme Personality of Godhead, it is also eternal.

In every saṁhitā, the jīva (living entity) has been accepted as eternal, and in the Pañcarātra the birth of the jīva is completely denied. 

Anything that is produced must also be annihilated. Therefore if we accept the birth of the living entity, we also have to accept his annihilation.

But since the Vedic literature says that the living entity is eternal, one should not think the living being to be produced at a certain time. In the beginning of the Parama-saṁhitā it is definitely stated that the face of material nature is constantly changeable. Therefore 'beginning,' 'annihilation' and all such terms are applicable only in the material nature.

"Considering all these points, one should understand that Śaṅkarācārya's statement that Saṅkarṣaṇa is born as a jīva is completely against the Vedic statements. His assertions are completely refuted by the above arguments. In this connection the commentary of Śrīdhara Svāmī on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (3.1.34) is very helpful."

For a detailed refutation of Śaṅkarācārya's arguments to prove Saṅkarṣaṇa an ordinary living being, one may refer to Śrīmat Sudarśanācārya's commentary on Śrī-bhāṣya, which is known as the Śruta-prakāśikā.

The original quadruple forms Kṛṣṇa, Baladeva, Pradyumna and Aniruddha expand into another quadruple, which is present in the Vaikuṇṭha planets of the spiritual sky. Therefore the quadruple forms in the spiritual sky are the second manifestation of the original quadruple in Dvārakā.

As explained above, Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are all changeless, transcendental plenary expansions of the Supreme Lord who have no relation to the material modes. 

The Saṅkarṣaṇa form in the second quadruple is not only a representation of Balarāma but also the original cause of the Causal Ocean, where Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu lies asleep, breathing out the seeds of innumerable universes.

In the spiritual sky there is a spiritual creative energy technically called śuddha-sattva, which is a pure spiritual energy that sustains all the Vaikuṇṭha planets with the full opulences of knowledge, wealth, prowess, etc.

All these actions of śuddha-sattva display the potencies of Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa, who is the ultimate reservoir of all individual living entities who are suffering in the material world.

When the cosmic creation is annihilated, the living entities, who are indestructible by nature, rest in the body of Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa. Saṅkarṣaṇa is therefore sometimes called the total jīva.

As spiritual sparks, the living entities have the tendency to be inactive in the association of material energy, just as sparks of a fire have the tendency to be extinguished as soon as they leave the fire. 

The spiritual nature of the living being can be rekindled, however, in association with the Supreme Being. Because the living being can appear either in matter or in spirit, the jīva is called the marginal potency.

Saṅkarṣaṇa is the origin of Kāraṇa Viṣṇu, who is the original form who creates the universes, and that Saṅkarṣaṇa is but a plenary expansion of Śrī Nityānanda Rāma.

TEXT 42

There the personal feature of Balarāma called Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa is the shelter of the spiritual energy. He is the primary cause, the cause of all causes.

TEXT 43

One variety of the pastimes of the spiritual energy is described as pure goodness [viśuddha-sattva]. It comprises all the abodes of Vaikuṇṭha.

TEXT 44

The six attributes are all spiritual. Know for certain that they are all manifestations of the opulence of Saṅkarṣaṇa.

TEXT 45

There is one marginal potency, known as the jīva. Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa is the shelter of all jīvas.

TEXT 46

Saṅkarṣaṇa is the original shelter of the puruṣa, from whom this world is created and in whom it is dissolved.

TEXT 47

He [Saṅkarṣaṇa] is the shelter of everything. He is wonderful in every respect, and His opulences are infinite. Even Ananta cannot describe His glory.

TEXT 48

That Saṅkarṣaṇa, who is transcendental pure goodness, is a partial expansion of Nityānanda Balarāma.

TEXT 49

I have briefly explained the eighth verse. Now please listen with attention as I explain the ninth verse.

TEXT 50

I offer my full obeisances unto the feet of Śrī Nityānanda Rāma, whose partial representation called Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, lying on the Kāraṇa Ocean, is the original puruṣa, the master of the illusory energy, and the shelter of all the universes.

TEXT 51

Outside the Vaikuṇṭha planets is the impersonal Brahman effulgence, and beyond that effulgence is the Kāraṇa Ocean, or Causal Ocean.

PURPORT

The impersonal glowing effulgence known as impersonal Brahman is the outer space of the Vaikuṇṭha planets in the spiritual sky. Beyond that impersonal Brahman is the great Causal Ocean, which lies between the material and spiritual skies.

The material nature is a by-product of this Causal Ocean.
Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu, who lies on the Causal Ocean, creates the universes merely by glancing upon material nature. Therefore Kṛṣṇa personally has nothing to do with the material creation. 

The Bhagavad-gītā confirms that the Lord glances over material nature and thus she produces the many material universes. Neither Kṛṣṇa in Goloka nor Nārāyaṇa in Vaikuṇṭha comes directly in contact with the material creation. They are completely aloof from the material energy.

It is the function of Mahā-saṅkarṣaṇa in the form of Kāraṇodakaśāyī Viṣṇu to glance over the material creation, which is situated beyond the limits of the Causal Ocean.

Material nature is connected with the Personality of Godhead by His glance over her and nothing more. It is said that she is impregnated by the energy of His glance.

The material energy, māyā, never even touches the Causal Ocean, for the Lord's glance focuses upon her from a great distance away.

The glancing power of the Lord agitates the entire cosmic energy, and thus its actions begin at once. This indicates that matter, however powerful she may be, has no power by herself. Her activity begins by the grace of the Lord, and then the entire cosmic creation is manifested in a systematic way.

The example of a woman's conception can help us understand this subject to a certain extent. The mother is passive, but the father puts his energy within the mother, and thus she conceives.

She supplies the ingredients for the birth of the child in her womb. Similarly, the Lord activates material nature, which then supplies the ingredients for cosmic development.

Material nature has two different phases. The aspect called pradhāna supplies the material ingredients for cosmic development, and the aspect called māyā causes the manifestation of her ingredients, which are temporary, like foam in the ocean.

In reality, the temporary manifestations of material nature are originally caused by the spiritual glance of the Lord. The Personality of Godhead is the direct, or remote, cause of creation, and material nature is the indirect, or immediate, cause.

Materialistic scientists, puffed-up by the magical changes their so-called inventions have brought about, cannot see the real potency of Godhead behind matter. 

Therefore the jugglery of science is gradually leading people to a godless civilization at the cost of the goal of human life. Having missed the goal of life, materialists run after self-sufficiency, not knowing that material nature is already self-sufficient by the grace of God.

Thus creating a colossal hoax in the name of civilization, they create an imbalance in the natural self-sufficiency of material nature.

To think of material nature as all in all, not knowing the original cause, is ignorance. Lord Caitanya appeared in order to dissipate this darkness of ignorance by igniting the spark of spiritual life that can, by His causeless mercy, enlighten the entire world.

To explain how māyā acts by Kṛṣṇa's power, the author of Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta gives the example that an iron rod in a fire, although it is not fire, becomes red-hot and acts like fire itself.

Similarly, all the actions and reactions of material nature are not actually the work of material nature but are actions and reactions of the energy of the Supreme Lord manifested through matter.

The power of electricity is transmitted through the medium of copper, but this does not mean that the copper is electricity. The power is generated at a powerhouse under the control of an expert living being.

Similarly, behind all the jugglery of the natural laws is a great living being, who is a person like the mechanical engineer in the powerhouse. It is by His intelligence that the entire cosmic creation moves in a systematic way.

The modes of nature that directly cause material actions are also originally activated by Nārāyaṇa. A simple example will explain how this is so: When a potter manufactures a pot from clay, the potter's wheel, his tools and the clay are the immediate causes of the pot, but the potter is the chief cause.

Similarly, Nārāyaṇa is the chief cause of all material creations, and the material energy supplies the ingredients of matter. Therefore without Nārāyaṇa, all other causes are useless, just as the potter's wheel and tools are useless without the potter himself.

Since materialistic scientists ignore the Personality of Godhead, it is as if they were concerned with the potter's wheel and its rotation, the potter's tools and the ingredients for the pots, but had no knowledge of the potter himself.

Therefore modern science has created an imperfect, godless civilization that is in gross ignorance of the ultimate cause. Scientific advancement should have a great goal to attain, and that great goal should be the Personality of Godhead.

In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that after conducting research for many, many births, great men of knowledge who stress the importance of experimental thought can know the Personality of Godhead, who is the cause of all causes. When one knows Him perfectly, one surrenders unto Him and then becomes a mahātmā.

TEXT 52

Surrounding Vaikuṇṭha is a mass of water that is endless, unfathomed and unlimited.

TEXT 53

The earth, water, fire, air and ether of Vaikuṇṭha are all spiritual. Material elements are not found there.

TEXT 54

The water of the Kāraṇa Ocean, which is the original cause, is therefore spiritual. The sacred Ganges, which is but a drop of it, purifies the fallen souls.

TEXT 55

In that ocean lies one plenary portion of Lord Saṅkarṣaṇa.

TEXT 56

He is known as the first puruṣa, the creator of the total material energy. He, the cause of the universes, the first incarnation, casts His glance over māyā.

TEXT 57

Māyā-śakti resides outside the Causal Ocean. Māyā cannot touch its waters.

TEXT 58

Māyā has two varieties of existence. One is called pradhāna or prakṛti. It supplies the ingredients of the material world.

PURPORT

Māyā, the external energy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is divided into two parts. Māyā is the cause and the ingredient of the cosmic manifestation.

As the cause of the cosmic manifestation she is known as māyā, and as the agent supplying the ingredients of the cosmic manifestation she is known as pradhāna. 

An explicit description of these divisions of external energy is given in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (11.24.1-4). Elsewhere in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (10.63.26) the ingredients and cause of the material cosmic manifestation are described as follows:

kālo daivaṁ karma jīvaḥ svabhāvo
dravyaṁ kṣetraṁ prāṇa ātmā vikāraḥ
tat-saṅghāto bīja-roha-pravāhas
tvan-māyaiṣā tan-niṣedhaṁ prapadye

"O my Lord! Time, activity, providence and nature are four parts of the causal aspect [māyā] of the external energy.

The conditioned vital force, the subtle material ingredients called the dravya, and material nature (which is the field of activity where the false ego acts as the soul), as well as the eleven senses and five elements (earth, water, fire, air and ether), which are the sixteen ingredients of the body-these are the ingredient aspect of māyā.

The body is generated from activity, and activity is generated from the body, just as a tree is generated from a seed that is generated from a tree. This reciprocal cause and effect is called māyā. My dear Lord, You can save me from this cycle of cause and effect. I worship Your lotus feet."

Although the living entity is primarily related to the causal portion of māyā, he is nevertheless conducted by the ingredients of māyā. Three forces work in the causal portion of māyā: knowledge, desire and activity. The material ingredients are a manifestation of māyā as pradhāna.

In other words, when the three qualities of māyā are in a dormant stage, they exist as prakṛti, avyakta or pradhāna. The word avyakta, referring to the nonmanifest, is another name of pradhāna.

In the avyakta stage, material nature is without varieties. Varieties are manifested by the pradhāna portion of māyā. The word pradhāna is therefore more important than avyakta or prakṛti.

TEXT 59

Because prakṛti is dull and inert, it cannot actually be the cause of the material world. But Lord Kṛṣṇa shows His mercy by infusing His energy into the dull, inert material nature.

TEXT 60

Thus prakṛti, by the energy of Lord Kṛṣṇa, becomes the secondary cause, just as iron becomes red-hot by the energy of fire.